Legal Opinion

In Re McCue

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1908No. Crim. No. 82PublishedCited by 24 opinions

PETITION for discharge on writ of habeas corpus, directed to the sheriff of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Application for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is serving a sentence. imposed on account of a violation of subdivision 5, section 647, Penal Code. This sub division provides: “Every idle or lewd or dissolute person, or associate of known thieves, ... is a vagrant.” It is insisted that this subdivision is void, in that the constituent elements entering into the crime are not defined, and as a consequence one charged thereunder is subject to the arbitrary meaning given by the court to the words employed; that it denounces a penalty against one who is either idle, lewd or dissolute without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ex parte TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. OatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Banbury v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Alegata v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Commonwealth v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API