Legal Opinion

Wilcoxson v. Stitt

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1884No. 9,398PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sutter. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This action was instituted on a contract between plaintiff of the first part and defendant of the second part, expressed in articles of agreement, by which plaintiff agreed to sell to defendant a tract of land for the sum of eighteen thousand four hundred and eighty dollars. Of this sum defendant paid one half, and agreed to pay the remaining half on or before the 21st day of March, 1878, together with interest from the date of the contract at the rate of ten per cent per annum. The defendant also agreed to pay all State, county, township, district, road, and levee taxes that were due when…

2Cited by51 opinions

  1. Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API