Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Ainsworth

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1887No. 9603PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSeaels, C. J.

This cause was here on a former appeal, the decision on which is reported in 63 Cal. 286.

In 1878, the defendants, Anna Ainsworth and A. G. Ainsworth, made their promissory note to Margaret M. Hutchinson for three thousand five hundred dollars, payable on the third day of September, 1879, with interest at ten per cent per annum.

The note was given for money loaned to said defendant by plaintiff, who is a married woman, and was her separate property.

To secure the payment of the promissory note, Anna Hutchinson executed the mortgage, to foreclose which this action is brought. The property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Wedel v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McClurg v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Hutchinson v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Meyer v. Van CollemNew York Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dillon v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Christensen v. HollingsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API