Markle v. Haase
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
These are -companion cases for personal injuries and property damage by plaintiff, E. Ruth Markle, and for medical expenses and loss of consortium by her husband, William M.-Marble, arising from a collision between Mrs. Marble’s automobile and a fire trucb driven by defendant, Clarence A. Haase. A collateral action for property damage by the owners of the fire trucb, the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the city of Winona, Minnesota, against E. Ruth Marble, consolidated with the above actions for trial, was withdrawn from the consideration of the jury at the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Zurko v. GilquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Norton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. Hall Funeral HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Vassallo ex rel. Brown v. MajeskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Floen v. SundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Hammond v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.