Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1960No. 37,875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The action was commenced by Fay V. Hammond for personal injury, and by Harry P. Hammond, her husband, for derivative damages, resulting from an accident wherein the car which she was driving was struck from behind on October 25, 1956, at about 5 p. m., by a bus owned by defendant bus company and driven by defendant Henry N. Williams, Jr.

According to plaintiff driver, she was proceeding south across the Third Avenue bridge in Minneapolis.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Floen v. SundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Cohen v. HirschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. King v. Wolf Grocery Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Tanski v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Dornack v. Barton Construction CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Schlukebier v. LaClairSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Oldendorf v. EideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API