Legal Opinion

Zurko v. Gilquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1954No. 36,092PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for the death of Maxim Zurko brought by the special administratrix of his estate against Roger G. Gilquist and Northland Greyhound Lines, Inc. An action for funeral expenses brought by decedent’s widow was incorporated in this action. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court directed a verdict in favor of Northland Greyhound Lines, Inc. At the close of the trial, the jury found for Roger G. Gilquist. Plaintiff appeals from the order of the district court denying her motion for a new trial against Gilquist only.

Between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craig v. Benedictine Sisters Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Froden v. RanzenbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Roach v. RothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Mailand v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Adee v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Priewe v. BartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API