Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Louis W. Myers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
On the eighth day of February, 1919, a collision occurred between a motor-truck belonging to the fire department of the city of Pasadena responding to a fire-alarm from North Fair Oaks Avenue and an electric railway train operated by the defendant corporation. The motor-truck was moving east on Bellefontaine Street, which terminated in Fair Oaks Avenue, and turned north on Fair Oaks Avenue without passing to the south of the intersection of the medial lines of Bellefontaine and Fair Oaks Avenue, colliding with a south-bound train of the defendant before the turn was completed. Charles Carlson…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- United States v. HoarU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1821
- Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Farley v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.