Legal Opinion
Martinco v. Hastings
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1963No. 38,802PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Plaintiff, Adam Martinco, commenced this action against defendant, William L. Hastings, to recover for personal injuries and property damage to his automobile sustained in a three-vehicle collision occurring between 9:30 and 10 a. m., September 6, 1960. Defendant answered, denying negligence on his part, and counterclaimed for damage to his automobile. He also filed a third-party complaint against Herbert Gabrielson, owner of the third vehicle involved in the collision, and Eugene H. Gabrielson, its driver, seeking recovery of property damage and indemnity or contribution if…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Block v. Target Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In re the Welfare of R.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Auger v. RofshusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.