Legal Opinion

Tate v. Saratoga Savings & Loan Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1989No. H004532PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

1. Introduction

Saratoga Savings and Loan Association appeals from a judgment confirming arbitration awards in favor of Ronald Tate and David Lazares and awarding each of them attorney fees and costs. Saratoga’s principal premise is that in form and substance the arbitration proceedings were so unfair the resulting award should have been vacated. Saratoga’s principal complaint is that the arbitration provision in a joint venture agreement allowed its opponents to “stack the deck” of arbitrators by controlling selection of the majority of arbitrators. This appeal presents…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API