Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
California law allows a court to correct or vacate a contractual arbitration award if the arbitrators “exceeded their powers.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1286.2, subd. (d), 1286.6, subd. (b).) In Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1, 28 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d 899], we held arbitrators do not exceed their powers merely by erroneously deciding a contested issue of law or fact; we did not, however, have occasion there to further delineate the standard for measuring the scope of the arbitrators’ authority. This case requires us to decide the standard by which courts…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.