Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
At issue in this case is the question whether elementary requirements of impartiality taken for granted in every judicial proceeding are suspended when the parties agree to resolve a dispute through arbitration.
*146The petitioner, Commonwealth Coatings Corporation, a subcontractor, sued the sureties on the prime contractor's bond to recover money alleged to be due for a painting job. The contract for painting contained an agreement to arbitrate such controversies. Pursuant to this agreement petitioner appointed one arbitrator, the prime contractor appointed a second, and these two together…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rogers v. Schering CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Commonwealth Coatings Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
3Cited by611 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
606 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.