Legal Opinion
Betz v. Pankow
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1993No. A052194PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
Appellant Heide V. Betz appeals the denial of her petition to vacate an arbitration award in favor of respondent Charles J. Pankow. She contends the award by two male members of a three-person arbitration panel was improperly influenced by gender bias against her and in favor of respondent. We conclude the record supports the trial court’s conclusion that appellant has not sustained her contention, and affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Appellant and respondent were the sole members of a partnership organized for the purpose of “ownership and operation of property.” Their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Eng. & Architects Assn. v. Community Dev. Dept. of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Azteca Construction, Inc. v. ADR Consulting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Reed v. Mutual Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Desert Outdoor Advertising v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.