Legal Opinion
Amherst Investment Co. v. Meacham
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1912No. 10222PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered September 29, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action for damages for breach of contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action to recover damages from a
real estate broker. There was a judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.
*285On January 5, 1909, the appellant executed and delivered to the respondent George F. Meacham the following written instrument:
“Seattle, Washington, Jan. 5, 09.
“George F. Meacham & Co., 200 New York Building, Seattle, Washington.
“We hereby appoint you our agent for a term of one year from date and authorize you to take charge of the following described property, to wit: (Street and number) 1600 to 1610% 2d Ave. inclusive. (Lot, block, addition, size) W. % L. 9 B. 45 & W…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Gordon v. Parke & Lacy Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Puget Sound Iron & Steel Works v. ClemmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Henry v. LindWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Debritz v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.