Legal Opinion

Henry v. Lind

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1969No. 39566PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

This case seems to prove the old saying that actions speak louder than words. Although the parties ¡drew their own contract and now disagree as to its meaning, they did act on it and we look to their conduct to ascertain their intentions.

Harvey and Lavine Henry sold their small advertising business and their home to the defendants, Reuben and Mary Lind, husband and wife, on a written agreement prepared by Mr. Henry. The typewritten contract said in part *200that Lavine Henry would retain a $275 per month salary from Firland Magazine during the 4-year term, of the contract.1

For about a year after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kennedy v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Amherst Investment Co. v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fancher v. LandrethWashington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Deep Water Brewing v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API