Legal Opinion

Tilberry v. Body

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1986No. 85-606PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented for our determination is whether the trial court’s judicial dissolution of the instant partnership is a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.

The plaintiff-appellee submits that the order of dissolution rendered below is interlocutory in nature, and does not determine the action and prevent a judgment. Appellee further argues that the trial court’s order was not made in a special proceeding and was not an order affecting a substantial right.

The defendants-appellants contend that the trial court’s order of a judicial dissolution was rendered in contravention…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bernbaum v. SilversteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Columbus v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. Port Clinton Fisheries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. K & S Circuits, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Celebrezze v. NetzleyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. General Electric Supply Co. v. Warden Electric, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pence v. DarstOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. International Diamond Exchange Jewelers, Inc. v. U.S. Diamond & Gold Jewelers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API