Legal Opinion

Amato v. General Motors Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1981No. 80-1090PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The question before this court, while difficult in resolution, may be stated with relative simplicity. Is an order, made pursuant to Civ. R. 23(C), that an action may be maintained as a class action, a final, appealable order pursuant to R. C. 2505.02?

The appellee argues that we need not answer this question because even assuming R. C. 2505.02 provides a right of appeal in cases such as this one, appellant is precluded from exercising this right since there was not compliance with Civ. R. *25554(B).5 When there are multiple claims or multiple parties in a single action, Civ. R. 54(B) permits a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,481 Hilda Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bernbaum v. SilversteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API