Legal Opinion

Celebrezze v. Netzley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1990No. 88-1755PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Per curiam

The controlling issue in this case is whether the denial of a motion for summary judgment constitutes a final appealable order, pursuant to R.C. 2505.02, where such motion is premised upon the assertion of an absolute immunity from liability in defamation actions accorded under the First Amendment to expressions of opinion. For the reasons which follow, we answer such query in the negative, and thus reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

R.C. 2505.02 provides, in pertinent part:

“An order that affects a substantial right in an action which in effect determines the action and prevents a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Sinnott v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ryll v. Columbus Fireworks Display Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. McCabe/Marra Co. v. City of DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. City of Riverside v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API