Legal Opinion

Noble v. Colwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1989No. 88-230PublishedCited by 396 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This court will grant a motion to certify only if there is a substantial constitutional question or if the case is of public or great general interest. Preamble and Rule II of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court. Novel questions of law or procedure appeal not only to the legal profession but also to this court’s collective interest in jurisprudence. Thus, it is with regret that we may not address the substantive legal issue raised on appeal since we hold that this court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter. This appeal did not emanate from a final appealable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Corrosioneering, Inc. v. Thyssen Environmental Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by396 opinions

  1. Celebrezze v. NetzleyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of Cleveland v. TrzebuckowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API