State v. Port Clinton Fisheries, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ.P. Celebrezze, J.
This appeal presents the issue of whether a trial court order which requires the state to disclose the identities of confidential informants is a final appealable order. For the reasons set forth below we conclude that it is such an order, and thus is subject to immediate appellate review. Accordingly we reverse the holding of the court of appeals and remand for further proceedings.
The courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review final orders of inferior tribunals within their respective districts. Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution; R.C. 2505.03. R.C. 2505.02 provides, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Continental Finance & Loan Co. Of West EndCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Walters v. Enrichment Center of Wishing Well, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Humphry v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.