Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 104PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

Plaintiff presents the sole question whether under the law of North Carolina a wife has a cause of action for loss of consortium resulting from a negligent injury to her husband. The Court of Appeals correctly recognized the historical and common law rule in North Carolina and answered no. For reasons stated below, we reverse.

I

At common law, consortium embraced those marital rights a husband had in respect to his wife. 2 R. Lee, North Carolina Family Law § 205 (3d ed. 1963); Prosser, Law of Torts § 125 (4th ed. 1971); Note: Torts — Recognition of Wife’s Right to Husband’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Berger v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API