Nicholson v. Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, Justice.
Plaintiff presents the sole question whether under the law of North Carolina a wife has a cause of action for loss of consortium resulting from a negligent injury to her husband. The Court of Appeals correctly recognized the historical and common law rule in North Carolina and answered no. For reasons stated below, we reverse.
I
At common law, consortium embraced those marital rights a husband had in respect to his wife. 2 R. Lee, North Carolina Family Law § 205 (3d ed. 1963); Prosser, Law of Torts § 125 (4th ed. 1971); Note: Torts — Recognition of Wife’s Right to Husband’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Berger v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.