Legal Opinion

DiDonato v. Wortman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1987No. 280A86PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This is an action for the wrongful death of a stillborn child. Plaintiff administrator alleges that defendant doctors provided prenatal care to the child’s mother, Norma DiDonato. Defendants estimated that the child would be born on 10 October 1982. On 26 October 1982 the child had not yet been born, and Mrs. DiDonato underwent an examination that revealed a healthy fetal heartbeat. Four days later the heartbeat had stopped and Mrs. DiDonato delivered a stillborn baby by Cesarean section. Plaintiff alleges that defendants’ negligence was a proximate cause of the child’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Krishnan v. SepulvedaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Andrews v. Reynolds Memorial Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Farley v. SartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API