Legal Opinion

Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 1967No. [No. 362, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOppenheimer, J.

For the first time in this State, the denial of a wife’s right to sue for loss of her husband’s consortium due to injuries received by him as the result of the defendant’s negligence, is expressly challenged as a violation of the wife’s rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. In recent years, the wife’s right of action for loss of consortium has been considered and reconsidered by a number of respected courts throughout the country and the subject has been discussed by many eminent authorities in textbooks and in law review articles.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Hoyt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Goesaert v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Schowgurow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API