Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
We must decide in this case whether the father and mother of a stillborn fetus have individual claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress against the defendants whose alleged negligence caused the stillbirth. For reasons differing from those relied upon by the Court of Appeals, we hold that both of the plaintiffs have stated cognizable claims, and we affirm the holding of the Court of Appeals.
As this case was dismissed prior to trial, the facts set forth herein are taken from the allegations of the complaint, which must be taken as true at this point. See Ragsdale…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by270 opinions
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoyle v. FREIGHTLINER, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.