Legal Opinion

Wall v. Stout

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1984No. 247PA83PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Before considering the merits of plaintiffs’ appeal, we first address defendant’s contention that plaintiffs’ exceptions 2 and 12-15 have not been properly preserved for appellate review. Defendant argues that plaintiffs violated Rule 10(b)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure and Rule 21 of the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts by failing to object to the jury charge at the conclusion of the charge and before the jury began its deliberations.

Rule 10(b)(2) provides, in part, as follows:

No party may assign as error any portion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Day v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API