Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Bumgardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1986No. 670A84PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*174FRYE, Justice.

The question before this Court is whether plaintiffs’ complaint states a claim recognizable in this State for medical malpractice and breach of contract where the injury complained of is defendant’s improper failure to replace an intrauterine device, resulting in plaintiff wife’s pregnancy and the consequent birth of a healthy child. We hold that the complaint states a recognizable claim for medical malpractice as to plaintiff wife.

In January 1979, plaintiff Varonica Jackson consulted defendant physician because she was experiencing abnormal uterine bleeding. She was admitted to…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Oates v. Jag, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Amos v. Oakdale Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Matthew Strum v. Exxon Company, Usa, a Division of Exxon Corporation Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Estate of Williams-Moore v. Alliance One Receivables Management, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  5. Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API