Legal Opinion

Brunswig Drug Co. v. Springer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1942No. Civ. 13780PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

An action having been prosecuted by respondent Springer for rescission of a conditional sales agree ment wherein rescission was denied but damages were awarded on account of the fraud of these appellants, the question is whether appellants may in this second action recover moneys which Springer was obligated to pay under such agreement, appellants having neglected to demand such moneys as a recoupment or as defensive matter in the first action. Incidentally also, it must be determined whether such vendee is entitled to recover a certain security pledged by him to secure his own performance of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Story & Isham Commercial Co. v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Datta v. StaabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Flickinger v. Swedlow Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  4. First State Bank v. MuzioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hulsey v. KoehlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API