Legal Opinion

Sutphin v. Speik

California Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1940No. L. A. 17142PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an action to recover royalties due under an assignment of a participating royalty interest in an oil and gas lease. As will presently appear, a judgment en tered in a prior action between the same parties has determined the issues involved in this case.

In 1926 the California Petroleum Corporation leased property consisting of two small lots in Huntington Beach, California (designated as lots 12 and 14), to C. K. Cole as lessee, reserving a royalty of 17Vs per cent. Cole assigned the lease to his wife, who on January 7, 1927, assigned to plaintiff Sutphin a royalty interest described…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Palomar Mobilehome Park Association v. City of San MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API