Hulsey v. Koehler
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
Defendant, Dr. Judith P. Koehler (hereinafter Koehler) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, John and June Hulsey (hereinafter the Hulseys) granting declaratory relief and reformation of a promissory note executed in connection with the Hulseys’ sale of a mobilehome park to Koehler in 1980.
At trial, Koehler moved to amend her answer to assert Code of Civil Procedure section 426.30 1 as an affirmative defense, alleging that the cause of action for reformation was barred because the Hulseys had failed to seek reformation by cross-complaint in an earlier…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Mattson v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Datta v. StaabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- University of Nevada v. TarkanianNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Melican v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Four Star Electric, Inc. v. F & H CONSTRUCTIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Worton v. WortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.