Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Muzio

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1983No. 14301PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Chief Justice.

This case presents the question of whether a party who has failed to raise the issues of homestead exemption and collection priorities in a prior default judgment action may be barred from litigating these same issues in a later foreclosure action.

First State Bank brought an action against Edward Muzio seeking judgment on a $9,500.00 promissory note for which he was a guarantor. After Muzio failed to appear and defend the action, the trial court entered a default judgment against him for the amount of the note plus interest. In a subsequent foreclosure action,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Arnett v. ReadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. American Bank of Commerce v. CovoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Torres v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Martha S. Griego, Debtor. Martha S. Griego v. Raymond E. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Blea v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Myers v. OlsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Moffat v. Branch ex rel. VincoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API