First State Bank v. Muzio
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAYNE, Chief Justice.
This case presents the question of whether a party who has failed to raise the issues of homestead exemption and collection priorities in a prior default judgment action may be barred from litigating these same issues in a later foreclosure action.
First State Bank brought an action against Edward Muzio seeking judgment on a $9,500.00 promissory note for which he was a guarantor. After Muzio failed to appear and defend the action, the trial court entered a default judgment against him for the amount of the note plus interest. In a subsequent foreclosure action,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Arnett v. ReadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- American Bank of Commerce v. CovoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Torres v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Martha S. Griego, Debtor. Martha S. Griego v. Raymond E. PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Blea v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Myers v. OlsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Moffat v. Branch ex rel. VincoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.