Flickinger v. Swedlow Engineering Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
— Defendants, appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in this action arising out of a contract for the per formance of work on a state highway project. As grounds for reversal, defendants contend: (1) that plaintiff is precluded from maintaining this action because of failure to comply with the state licensing requirements (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 7025-7031); (2) that a prior judgment which has now become final is res judicata on the claim here asserted; and (3) that plaintiff’s present action is barred by section 439 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Since defendants’ third point is well taken and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Schrader v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Saunders v. New Capital for Small Businesses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.