Tudhope v. Potts
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, Jl) Debt. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
The sole question here is whether suit can be maintained against a surety upon a deceased guardian's bond by the ward, after attaining her majority, in the absence of an accounting.
On the death of plaintiff's father, her mother, Frances E. Potts, was in May, 1870, appointed as her guardian, filing her bond with her father,, the defendant, as surety. The guardian received $775 from the estate of the father of her ward on account of the infant; but she filed no inventory, and made no report to the probate court, but died on November 17, 1886. In June, 1889, plaintiff became of age.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gott v. CulpMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- In re AllgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Schlee v. Estate of DarrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Royston v. RoystonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Connelly v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hantzch v. MassoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Klass v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Pennington v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.