Legal Opinion

Gott v. Culp

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1881PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. Appeal from allowance of guardian’s account in the probate court. The guardian brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff in error was appointed by the probate court for the county of Washtenaw, in 1861, as guardian of defendant in error, then about six years old, her name being then Goodrich. In 1876 she married. Mr. Gott at the end of his trust filed his account, which was allowed as presented, no contest being made in the probate court over its correctness. The ward, however, appealed to the circuit court for the county of Washtenaw, setting up four grounds of complaint, which were in substance that the guardian had *269failed to keep money invested, had charged for excessive expenditures and made…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Woodman v. Kera LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In re Mower's appealMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API