Legal Opinion

In re Allgier

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1884No. 9,423PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing a new trial. Appeal by the executors. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

—In November, 1867, Henry Brickwedel was appointed by the Probate Court of Sutter County guardian of the persons and estate of Delia and Augusta Allgier, then the infant heirs at law of Nicholas Allgier, deceased. The appointee qualified, took charge and control of his wards and"'of their estate, and continued in office until the day of his death. He died in the month of April, 1883, without having made a final settlement with the court of his guardianship.

After his death his executors presented to the Superior Court of Sutter County a report in writing of the condition of the estate,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Theller v. SuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Chaquette v. OrtetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Bush v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Peck v. BramanIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. In Re Estate of BoyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API