Schlee v. Estate of Darrow
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Claimants filed claim for moneys received by guardian on sale of real estate, against the estate of the surety on guardian’s bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChampeen, J.
Appellants presented a claim before the commissioners to hear claims against the estate of Charles H. Darrow, deceased, as follows:
“ Estate of Gharles H. Darrow, Deceased,
To George Schlee and Mary Finison, Dr.:
1883. December 24. To amount received by Jacob Berner, as guardian of George Schlee and Mary Schlee, nee Finison, on sale of real estate of said wards by virtue of a license from the probate court for the county of Ingham, and a bond filed in said court previous thereto, with said Charles H. Darrow as surety, and adjudged due to said George Schlee and Mary Finison from said Berner and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Campau v. Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Landon ex rel. Cummins v. CometMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- McKim v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nolan v. GarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Brooks v. HargraveMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Mitchell v. Bay Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.