Hantzch v. Massolt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., sustaining demurrers to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining the demurrers of the defendants to his complaint, the material allegations of which are as follows: That on January 23, 1885, the plaintiff was a minor, and on that day John P. Noel was appointed his guardian by the probate court of the county of Hennepin, who accepted the trust, and executed to the judge of such court a guardian’s bond in the penal sum of $1,000, with William Massolt and John Heinrich as sureties, which contained the conditions required by law. That Noel received as such guardian the sum of $843.28, the property of the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bullard v. MoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Allen v. TiffanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Murray v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Administrator of Sargent's Estate v. Administrator of Kimball's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Litchfield v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of Springfield v. ClementMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Ganser v. GanserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Chitty v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.