Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Newman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1913No. 2486PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Haskell County Court; A. L. Beckett, Judge. Action by Lillie A. Newman against C. O. Pennington and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

C. O. Pennington is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting administrator of the estate of W. M. Newman, deceased. On March 27, 1909, he filed in the county court of Haskell county an inventory and appraisement of the property belonging to the estate, which inventory showed said estate to be of less value than $1,500. On September 6, 1909, on motion of defendant in error, Eillie A. Newman, widow of deceased, an order was made by the county court, setting aside “for the support of herself and minor children all the personal property of the said estate, after paying the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Green's Administratrix v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Gott v. CulpMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Security-First Nat. Bank v. KingWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Spencer v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Howard v. JeffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API