Legal Opinion

Klass v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1901PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Nicholas Klass against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff claims to have been injured through a failure of the defendant to keep its street in repair on the 31st of December, 1895. On January 7, 1896, his petition was presexxted to the common council in compliance with the statute (section 46 of an act approved June 1, 1895), which provides that:

“No action shall be brought against said city, nor any of its boards, commissions, or officers, for any negligent injury, unless it be commenced within one year from the time when the injury was received, nor xxnless notice shall be given in writing, within three months from the time of such…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Railway Passenger & Freight Conductors' Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n v. LoomisIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Union Mortgage, Banking & Trust Co. v. Peters & TrezevantMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Home Insurance & Banking Co. v. MyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Renackowsky v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WhitehillIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Huhtala v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bank of Jonesboro v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Lumber Village, Inc v. SieglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API