Legal Opinion
Henrikson v. Udall
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 22, 1964No. Civ. No. 41749PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Chief Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment in an action initiated by plaintiffs under the Federal Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., asking for review of a decision by the *511Secretary of the Interior who ruled against plaintiffs’ mining claim on Squaw Creek Placer. The motion is based on the pleadings and the exhibits lodged and filed with the court and constituting the entire record of proceedings heretofore had by plaintiffs in their hearing, and the review therefrom, before the Department of the Interior. Defendants contend that the undisputed facts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Alonzo A. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Stocker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alfred Coleman and Edward J. McClennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Henrikson v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Multiple Use, Inc. v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1972
- Henrikson v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Osborne v. HammitDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.