Legal Opinion

Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 22, 1959No. 14953PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Per curiam

This case relates to appellants’ claims under provisions of the mining laws which authorize “occupation and purchase” of Government lands containing “valuable mineral deposits.” Rev.Stat. §§ 2319, 2325, 2329 (1875), 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 22, 29, 35. The Department of the Interior instituted proceedings contesting the claims on the ground that the allegedly “valuable mineral deposits” of sand and gravel, located thirteen miles from the center of Las Vegas, Nevada, were insufficient, inter alia, in quantity, quality and accessibility to a market to constitute a valid discovery. The hearing officer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Ickes v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State of Washington v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Dredge Corp. v. PennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Alfred Coleman and Edward J. McClennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API