Legal Opinion
Multiple Use, Inc. v. Morton
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 9, 1972No. Civ. 71-211-PCT-WCFPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FREY, District Judge.
The matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, and 28 U.S.C.- §§ 1361 and 1391(e), and seeks relief from the administrative decision of the Secretary of the Interior in that the Robe Roye-Martin-Missing Link placer mining claim is alleged to be null and void for lack of discovery of a valuable mineral deposit. United States v. Silverton Mining and Milling Co., IBLA 70-22…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert B. Lara v. The Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Multiple Use, Inc. v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Bales v. RuchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1981
- Mendenhall v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1982
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.