Legal Opinion

Henrikson v. Udall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1965No. 19560_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

350 F.2d 949

Charles H. HENRIKSON and Oliver Henrikson, Appellants,

v.

Stewart L. UDALL, United States Secretary of the Interior,

The United Statesof America, and George Steed,

District Ranger, United States

Department ofAgriculture

Forest Service, Appellees.

No. 19560.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1965, Rehearing Denied Oct. 28, 1965.

Vernon Vale, Nagle, Vale & McDowall, San Mateo, Cal., for appellants.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., S. Billingsley Hill and Robert M. Perry, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., J. Harold Weise, Asst.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. Henrikson v. UdallDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Converse v. UdallDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
  3. Moseley v. HickelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Ernest Jennings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API