Legal Opinion
Alonzo A. Adams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1963No. 17902_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
In the summary judgment here under review it is declared that the United States is the sole owner of certain National Forest lands, to the exclusion of any asserted mining claims or locations of Alonzo A. Adams. Under the judgment Adams is enjoined from using, occupying or maintaining structures on these lands, or from entering upon the lands for the purpose of claiming or asserting the existence of mining claims or locations. Two counterclaims, under which affirmative relief was sought, were dismissed.
On appeal, Adams presents three lines of argument: (1) summary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dredge Corp. v. PennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Alfred Coleman and Edward J. McClennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.