Henrikson v. Udall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court, Northern District of California, the effect of which was to uphold appellees’ decision denying appellants’ application for a land patent in the Tahoe National Forest.
It is the function of neither this Court nor of the District Court, in a proceeding such as this, to weigh the evidence adduced in the administrative proceeding. Rather, if upon review of the entire record of that proceeding there is found substantial evidence to support the Secretary’s decision, that decision must be affirmed. Universal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Henrikson v. UdallDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1964
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Charlestone Stone Products Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Shell Oil Co. v. KleppeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Shiny Rock Mining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.