Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Hammit

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 20, 1964No. Civ. 414PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, OPINION AND DECISION

BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.

The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 1009 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201, by J. R. Osborne and others to review the final decision of the Secretary of the Interior dated October 23, 1961 cancelling certain unpatented mining claim locations. The trial was limited to the reception of the entire record of the administrative proceedings. Evidence aliunde such record was rejected. The Court, having reviewed the evidence and the arguments made on behalf of the respective parties, does now make the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Alonzo A. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Anchorage Sand & Gravel Co. v. SchubertDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Mendenhall v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API