Legal Opinion

Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. Greer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1968No. 41471PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice.

Before us is an insurer’s appeal from a judgment on the jury verdict allowing the insured to recover $2,258.00 for a fire loss. Included in this amount are multiple items of destroyed property which were not in controversy. Their value ($790) was tendered in the amended answer and at the close of the evidence, in contest was insurer’s liability for the total loss of a barn (insured as an “appurtenant” structure for $800.00) and of baled hay stored in it. The undisputed value of the hay was $1,440.00. Insurer alleged, and argues here, that its policy expressly excepts from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington National Insurance v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. L. C. Adam Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. RoysdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crown Life Ins. Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Phico Insurance Company v. Providers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API