Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. Greer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
McINERNEY, Justice.
Before us is an insurer’s appeal from a judgment on the jury verdict allowing the insured to recover $2,258.00 for a fire loss. Included in this amount are multiple items of destroyed property which were not in controversy. Their value ($790) was tendered in the amended answer and at the close of the evidence, in contest was insurer’s liability for the total loss of a barn (insured as an “appurtenant” structure for $800.00) and of baled hay stored in it. The undisputed value of the hay was $1,440.00. Insurer alleged, and argues here, that its policy expressly excepts from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington National Insurance v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. L. C. Adam Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. RoysdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Life Ins. Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Cornhusker Casualty Company v. SkajCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Phico Insurance Company v. Providers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.