Legal Opinion
Cornhusker Casualty Company v. Skaj
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 18, 2015No. 13-8004, 13-8010, 13-8014PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Cornhusker Casualty Company (“Corn-husker”) appeals from the district court’s summary-judgment ruling, arguing that the district court incorrectly concluded that Cornhusker was estopped from asserting noncoverage as a defense to the claims of Shari and Steve Skaj. The Skajs have cross-appealed the district court’s sua sponte entry of summary judgment against them on their counterclaim for attorneys’ fees. Vincent Rosty has filed a cross-appeal as well, 1 alleging that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to Cornhusker on some of his tort-based…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Belnap v. Iasis HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- SM Kids, LLC v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- SCO Group, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Cotton v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.