Legal Opinion

Washington National Insurance v. Craddock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1937No. 6945PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Craddock was plaintiff in the trial court and the insurance company was defendant. That court sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and, upon his declining further to amend, dismissed the cause. The Court of Civil Appeals decided that the petition stated a cause of action and accordingly reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause thereto for trial on its merits. 83 S. W. (2d) 689. The suit was upon a policy of accident insurance. A recovery of more than $1,400.00 was sought,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McCoy v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Home Benefit Ass'n v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Ulico Casualty Co. v. Allied Pilots Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. McGuireTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rice v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Southland Life Insurance v. VelaTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API