Legal Opinion
Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Roysden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1953No. 35062PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, T. R. Roysden, against the defendant, Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company, to recover damages for loss by fire of household furniture and personal property. The parties to this action will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court, that is, the plaintiff in error as the defendant and the defendant in error as the plaintiff. The fire insurance policy was written by Claris Ricker, local agent of the insurance company at Chickasha, Oklahoma, and was issued on July 24, 1948, for a term of one year and in the amount of $1,000. Said policy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance v. T. M. Richardson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Canady, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- National Aid Life Ass'n v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- David Lee Willis v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, and Rogers County Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Roark v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Iven v. RoderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.