Legal Opinion

Ivanov v. Farmers Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2008No. CC 9910-10826; CA A123043; SC S054199PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*424DE MUNIZ, C. J.

This case involves Oregon’s Personal Injury Protection (PIP) statutes, ORS 742.518 to 742.540. Plaintiffs initiated this case by filing what they initially styled as a class action against defendant insurance companies (Farmers), seeking payment of PIP-related medical expenses that Farmers had denied. Plaintiffs also sought a declaratory judgment holding that “Farmers may not deny [PIP] benefits to its insureds solely on the basis of generalized criteria not specific to claimants’ injuries,” and that “Farmers may not deny [PIP] benefits to [its] insureds * * * unless [the]…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Thoens v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Foraker v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API