Legal Opinion

State v. Rainey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1985No. TC C80-10-33816, CA A20105, SC 29154PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*461CARSON, J.

The state petitioned for review from a judgment of the Court of Appeals which reversed a criminal conviction. The issue is the propriety of the trial court’s jury instructions explaining prima facie evidence and stating that proof of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance is prima facie evidence of knowledge of its character.

FACTS

Defendant was convicted of knowingly delivering a controlled substance in violation of ORS 475.992.1 Defendant admitted the delivery, but argued that he did not know the delivered boxes contained marijuana. The trial judge instructed the jury, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. NefstadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Handy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. MayoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. WiltseOregon Supreme Court · 2024

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API